Saudi audiences stopped watching ads and started watching people
We looked at 340 pieces of content we shipped last year. The ones that worked had a face, a place and a reason. The ones that didn't had a logo.
Comment quality beats follower count. Here is the scoring sheet we use.
We stopped asking for media kits two years ago. A PDF with follower counts and story-reach percentages tells you what a creator wants you to see, not what their audience actually does when the post goes live. Comment quality beats follower count, and it takes about twenty minutes to check.
So we built a scoring sheet. Five signals, all checkable from the account itself, before a single message goes to the creator and long before anyone drafts a contract.
Open the last five posts and read the comments, not the count. Real engagement reads like real people: specific reactions, disagreement, a question about price or where to buy, a friend tagged by name. Bought engagement reads like a template. Heart-eyes emoji, "so pretty," the same three phrases repeated across different accounts, often within minutes of the post going live. That timing is the tell. Real comments trickle in over hours. Pod comments cluster in the first ten minutes because the group fires the moment the post drops.
Engagement pods are common enough in the Gulf market that follower count alone tells you nothing about whether a post will move anyone. A creator with forty thousand followers and a comment section full of actual back-and-forth will outsell one with ten times the following and a wall of emoji.
Follower count also hides geography and dialect. A Jeddah-based creator with a Khaleeji-leaning audience is a different buy than a Riyadh creator whose comments are mostly Egyptian and Levantine followers admiring the aesthetic from outside the market. Check where the engaged comments actually come from, not what the bio claims.
Dialect matters as much as city. A caption written in formal Arabic lands differently than one written in Najdi or Hijazi colloquial, and the comments show you which one this particular audience responds to. If you're selling in Dammam and the creator's real audience skews Riyadh, no reach number fixes that gap.
We've turned down creators with three times the following of ones we hired, because the smaller creator's comments were full of the brand's actual customer: same city, same age range, same buying language. Reach without overlap is just a bigger room full of the wrong people.
A media kit shows reach. It never shows whether the creator can carry a brief. Scroll the last ten posts and look for range: different settings, different framing, some copy-led and some purely visual. A creator who has shot the same product on the same shelf in the same light for a year either has no creative range or has never been asked to use it. That becomes your problem the day you're paying them.
Ask for two or three unpublished examples from other brand work, or a short brief-to-draft test before the contract, not after. It costs nothing and tells you more than any deck.
Scroll back six months before you commit. Has the creator promoted a direct competitor recently? A one-off is fine. Taking every paid post regardless of category is a pattern, and it dilutes your placement before it even runs. Watch for tone mismatches too: a creator who leans hard comedic won't land a luxury or financial brief no matter how strong their numbers look, and a creator carrying a recent public controversy brings that history into your comments section on day one.
None of this needs a subscription or a tool. It needs twenty minutes per creator and a willingness to read the comments instead of the deck. The sheet stays short on purpose, because by the time you've built a ten-point rubric, the campaign has already missed its window.
Want this handled for Riyadh 12211 or the rest of the Kingdom? Talk to our social media management service.
Learn more →